Vulnerability hotspots and Cross-border SDG issues

Vulnerability hotspots

Climate Change and Security Hotspots

The climate change and security hotspots were identified during the participatory assessment process for Central Asia which included relevant stakeholders from government agencies and non-governmental organizations, academia as well as experts. All of the climate change and security hotspots that were identified in Central Asia are regional/transboundary hotspots. Regional hotspots have regional security implications, and may extend across ecosystems in more than one country.

Climate change and security hotspots in Central Asia, 2016 Legend for climate change and security hotspots in Central Asia, 2016

1. Densely populated areas (🟥 high security risk by 2030)

Areas like the Ferghana valley as well as large irrigated oases, mainly along the Amu Darya and Syr Darya Rivers, as well as piedmont metropolitan areas are characterized by high population density and relatively scarce water and land resources shared across borders. Partly affected by tensions and instability already in the past, the security risks could increase if security of livelihoods, water, energy and food decreases due to climate change.

KEY RECOMMENDATIONS:

2. Remote areas on the Afghan border (🟥 high security risk by 2030)

Central Asia’s southern remote areas, notably the Tajik-Afghan and the Turkmen-Afghan border areas have been identified as climate change and security hotspots in light of extreme weather events intensified by climate change and their exposure to spill-over of instability.

KEY RECOMMENDATIONS:

3. High mountain areas (🟨 security risk by 2030)

Mountain communities have increased vulnerability due to high poverty and isolation, frequent natural disasters, visible climate change effects and sporadic discontent and unrest in some mountainous regions.

KEY RECOMMENDATIONS:

4. Central Asia breadbasket (🟩 low security risk by 2030)

The grain-producing area in northern Kazakhstan has been identified as a regional climate change hotspot, although security implications in the national context are low thanks to stable economic policies. Soaring grain prices or crop deficits may however undermine food security in the region.

KEY RECOMMENDATIONS:

5. The Amu Darya River Basin (🟨 medium security risk by 2030)

The Amu Darya Basin is highly dependent on irrigation and hydropower with already existing disagreements on water usage, and is characterized by environmental degradation, in particular in the delta area. Reinforced by climate change, this might have severe impacts for water, food, livelihood and human security with strong cross-border implications.

KEY RECOMMENDATIONS:

6. The Syr Darya River Basin (🟨 medium security risk by 2030)

The Syr Darya River is highly regulated for irrigation and hydropower purposes. The basin also faces risks from toxic and radioactive waste. The current water allocation regime might come under threat from changing water availability due to climate change which might increase water, food, and socioeconomic insecurity.

KEY RECOMMENDATIONS:

7. The Zarafshan River Basin (🟨 medium security risk by 2030)

The Zarafshan River, shared by Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, suffers risk of upstream pollution from growing industrial activities and mining and downstream pollution from agriculture, and faces increased water insecurity due to climate change impacts which could affect interstate relations.

KEY RECOMMENDATIONS:

8. The Ili River and Balkhash Lake (🟨 medium security risk by 2030)

Lake Balkhash in southeastern Kazakhstan is the largest lake in Central Asia and fed mainly by the Ili River, which originates in China. The fragile ecological balance of the lake is at risk by human, economic and climate change impacts, which affect the population in the basin and pose a challenge for transboundary water management.

KEY RECOMMENDATIONS:

9. The Chu and Talas River Basins (🟩 low security risk by 2030)

The Chu and Talas River Basins, shared by Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, are an important economic area for agriculture, hydropower and mining sectors with a growing population. While climate change might decrease the availability of water, the good co-operation mechanisms that are already in place between the two countries minimize the security risks.

KEY RECOMMENDATIONS:

10. The Caspian Sea and coastline (🟨 medium security risk by 2030)

Being rich in oil and gas resources, the Caspian Sea is economically important and at the same time vulnerable to climate change and water level fluctuations. Climate change might affect economic and livelihood security, and the unclear marine borders might make joint responses more difficult.

KEY RECOMMENDATIONS:

11. The Aral Sea and coastline (🟩 low to 🟨 medium security risk by 2030)

The tragedy of the Aral Sea is likely to continue due to higher temperatures and due to low run-off reaching the sea, even though the situation in the northern part has improved. Anthropogenic pressure on water resources remains the major risk factor. Climate change will intensify water and environmental insecurity of the affected population.

KEY RECOMMENDATIONS:

Cross-border SDG issues

Central Asia, a region encompassing Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, is a culturally rich and diverse region that has undergone significant social and economic development in recent years. Addressing cross-border issues in Central Asia is the key for achieving SDGs

Water management

Central Asia is home to several major rivers, including the Amu Darya and Syr Darya, which are shared by multiple countries. Disputes over water allocation, infrastructure development, and pollution are common. One solution is to promote regional cooperation through the establishment of joint institutions, such as the International Fund for Saving the Aral Sea (IFAS), which is supported by the EU and UNDP. Other initiatives include the UNDP’s “CAREC Integrated Water Resources Management Project” and the EU’s “Central Asia Water-Energy Nexus Dialogue Platform.”

Energy security

Central Asia is a major producer and exporter of oil, gas, and electricity, but many countries still face energy shortages and rely on imports. There is also a need to promote renewable energy and energy efficiency to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The EU’s “Central Asia Energy Security Dialogue” and the UNDP’s “Regional Dialogue on Energy Security in Central Asia” aim to promote cooperation on energy policy and investment.

Trade development

Central Asia has enormous potential for trade, but many countries still face barriers to accessing international markets. Promoting trade and economic integration, as well as investing in infrastructure and human capital, can help unlock this potential. The EU’s “Supporting the Implementation of WTO TFA in Central Asia” project and the UNDP’s “Integrated Framework for Trade-Related Assistance to Least Developed Countries” aim to promote trade facilitation and economic growth.

Border management

Central Asia has many porous borders, which pose security risks and can impede trade and travel. Promoting transparency and cooperation among border agencies, as well as investing in infrastructure and technology, can help address these challenges. The EU’s “Border Management Programme for Central Asia” and the UNDP’s “Central Asia Border Security Programme” are working to support these efforts.

Environmental degradation

Central Asia faces many environmental challenges, including desertification, deforestation, and air and water pollution. These issues often transcend national boundaries and require regional cooperation and policy coordination. The EU’s “Central Asia Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services and Climate Change” project and the UNDP’s “Central Asian Desert Initiative” are working to promote sustainable land use and environmental management.

Map of Central Asia, 2020